Abstract
Ocean acidification, a consequence of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) absorption by oceans, poses significant challenges to marine ecosystems and fisheries worldwide. In Iceland, a nation heavily reliant on marine resources, the impacts of ocean acidification are particularly concerning due to the country’s unique position in the North Atlantic, where cold waters enhance CO₂ uptake. This article examines the effects of ocean acidification on Iceland’s marine ecosystems, focusing on key species and habitats, and its cascading impacts on the nation’s fisheries sector. Through a situational analysis and literature review, the study highlights the vulnerability of calcifying organisms such as mollusks and corals, alongside disruptions to fish physiology and food webs. Connections are drawn to international frameworks, including the Paris Agreement and the Arctic Council, which address ocean acidification as part of broader climate change mitigation efforts. Recommendations for Iceland include enhanced monitoring, policy integration with global treaties, and adaptive fisheries management to mitigate socioeconomic impacts. The article underscores the urgent need for localized research and international cooperation to safeguard Iceland’s marine biodiversity and economic stability.
Introduction
Ocean acidification is an often overlooked yet critical consequence of anthropogenic climate change, driven by the ocean’s absorption of excess atmospheric CO₂. As CO₂ dissolves in seawater, it forms carbonic acid, reducing pH levels and altering the carbonate chemistry essential for marine life. Globally, the ocean has absorbed approximately 30% of the CO₂ emitted since the Industrial Revolution, resulting in a pH decrease of about 0.1 units, with projections of further declines by the end of the century (IPCC, 2019). This phenomenon threatens marine ecosystems by impairing the growth of calcifying organisms, disrupting food webs, and affecting the physiology and behavior of numerous species.
Iceland, located in the North Atlantic, is uniquely vulnerable to ocean acidification due to its cold, well-mixed waters that naturally absorb higher levels of CO₂. The country’s economy is heavily dependent on fisheries, which account for approximately 6% of GDP and 40% of export earnings (Statistics Iceland, 2023). Species such as cod, haddock, and shellfish, integral to both ecosystems and economies, face risks from changing ocean chemistry. Additionally, Iceland’s marine habitats, including cold-water coral reefs and planktonic communities, serve as critical components of the North Atlantic ecosystem, influencing global ocean circulation and carbon sequestration.
This article explores the specific impacts of ocean acidification on Iceland’s marine ecosystems and fisheries, situating the issue within a global context through intergovernmental organizations and treaties. It aims to synthesize current knowledge, identify research gaps, and propose actionable recommendations for mitigation and adaptation. By addressing both ecological and socioeconomic dimensions, the study seeks to inform policy and foster international collaboration to address this pressing environmental challenge.
Situational Analysis
Iceland’s marine environment is characterized by its location at the confluence of Arctic and Atlantic waters, influenced by major currents such as the North Atlantic Current and the East Greenland Current. These cold, nutrient-rich waters support high productivity but also facilitate greater CO₂ uptake due to lower temperatures increasing gas solubility. Studies indicate that the North Atlantic, including waters surrounding Iceland, is experiencing some of the fastest rates of ocean acidification globally, with pH declines outpacing the global average (Olafsson et al., 2009). This rapid change is attributed to both anthropogenic emissions and natural upwelling processes that bring deeper, CO₂-rich waters to the surface.
The primary ecological concern in Iceland is the impact on calcifying organisms, such as mollusks, echinoderms, and cold-water corals, which struggle to build and maintain calcium carbonate structures in acidified waters. Cold-water corals, found in Iceland’s deep-sea habitats, are critical for biodiversity, providing shelter for numerous species. Their degradation could have cascading effects on ecosystem stability. Plankton, the foundation of the marine food web, also shows sensitivity to pH changes, with potential declines in populations affecting higher trophic levels, including commercially important fish species like cod and herring (Dupont & Pörtner, 2013).
Fisheries, a cornerstone of Iceland’s economy, are directly threatened by these ecological shifts. The country harvests over 1.1 million tons of fish annually, with cod alone contributing significantly to export revenues (Marine Research Institute, 2022). Acidification-induced stress on fish physiology, including impacts on growth, reproduction, and sensory functions, could reduce stock resilience. Moreover, the shellfish industry, though smaller in scale, faces immediate risks due to the direct impact on shell formation. Socioeconomically, rural coastal communities, heavily reliant on fishing, are particularly vulnerable to declines in catch and market value.
Iceland’s response to ocean acidification is intertwined with its broader climate change policies. The government has committed to the Paris Agreement, targeting significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, which indirectly addresses ocean acidification by curbing CO₂ emissions (Government of Iceland, 2017). However, specific national strategies targeting marine acidification remain limited, highlighting a gap between global commitments and localized action. Collaboration with intergovernmental bodies like the Arctic Council, which has prioritized ocean acidification in its research agendas, offers opportunities for Iceland to leverage regional expertise and resources.
Literature Review
The scientific understanding of ocean acidification has advanced significantly over the past two decades, with numerous studies documenting its mechanisms and impacts. The absorption of CO₂ by oceans reduces seawater pH and the availability of carbonate ions, critical for organisms like corals, shellfish, and some plankton to build their skeletal structures (Doney et al., 2009). Globally, pH levels have decreased by 0.1 units since pre-industrial times, with projections suggesting a further drop of 0.3-0.4 units by 2100 under high-emission scenarios (IPCC, 2019). This chemical shift disrupts not only calcifying species but also the broader marine food web through trophic interactions.
In the North Atlantic, research indicates accelerated acidification rates due to the solubility of CO₂ in colder waters. Olafsson et al. (2009) conducted long-term measurements in Icelandic waters, finding a pH decline of 0.0024 units per year, faster than the global average. Their study highlights seasonal variability, with winter upwelling exacerbating acidification. This is particularly concerning for Iceland, where marine ecosystems are adapted to stable, cold conditions, and rapid chemical changes may outpace evolutionary adaptation.
Ecological impacts in Iceland mirror global patterns but are amplified by regional conditions. Cold-water corals, such as Lophelia pertusa, are highly sensitive to reduced carbonate saturation, with studies predicting near-complete loss of viable habitat in the North Atlantic by 2100 under current emission trajectories (Guinotte et al., 2006). Planktonic species, including pteropods, show reduced shell growth and survival rates under experimental acidification conditions, which could disrupt food availability for fish (Comeau et al., 2010). Fish species, while less directly affected, exhibit behavioral and physiological changes, including impaired olfactory functions critical for predator avoidance and foraging (Munday et al., 2009).
The socioeconomic implications for fisheries have been explored in global contexts but lack specificity for Iceland. Denman et al. (2011) suggest that acidification could lead to significant declines in fish stocks, impacting global food security and livelihoods. In Iceland, where fisheries dominate the economy, such declines would disproportionately affect employment and export revenues. Limited research on local shellfish industries indicates that acidification may increase operational costs due to slower growth rates and higher mortality, as seen in other regions like the Pacific Northwest (Barton et al., 2012).
Internationally, ocean acidification is increasingly recognized within climate change frameworks. The Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) implicitly addresses acidification through CO₂ mitigation targets, though it lacks specific provisions for marine chemistry (Harrould-Kolieb & Herr, 2012). The Arctic Council, of which Iceland is a member, has prioritized ocean acidification in its scientific assessments, emphasizing the Arctic’s heightened vulnerability (Arctic Council, 2020). Additionally, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Goal 14 (Life Below Water), advocate for protecting marine ecosystems from acidification impacts through research and policy integration.
Despite these advances, significant gaps remain in understanding localized impacts in Iceland. Most studies focus on global or regional scales, with limited data on species-specific responses or socioeconomic consequences in Icelandic waters. Furthermore, while international treaties provide frameworks, their translation into national policy remains inconsistent, underscoring the need for tailored research and governance mechanisms.
Discussion
The impacts of ocean acidification on Iceland’s marine ecosystems are multifaceted, encompassing direct physiological effects on organisms and indirect disruptions to food webs and ecosystem services. Calcifying species, such as cold-water corals and shellfish, are the most immediately threatened, with reduced carbonate availability hindering skeletal formation. This not only jeopardizes individual species but also the structural integrity of habitats that support biodiversity. For instance, the degradation of coral reefs in Icelandic waters could diminish refuge for juvenile fish, impacting recruitment rates for commercially valuable stocks like cod.
Plankton, as the base of the marine food web, represents another critical vulnerability. Declines in calcifying plankton, such as pteropods, could reduce food availability for higher trophic levels, including herring and mackerel, which are staple species in Iceland’s fisheries. Moreover, acidification-induced stress on fish physiology, such as altered sensory functions and metabolic rates, may lower resilience to other stressors like overfishing and warming waters, compounding the challenges facing the industry.
Socioeconomically, the implications for Iceland are profound. Fisheries are not merely an economic sector but a cultural and social lifeline for many communities. A decline in fish stocks or shellfish production could lead to unemployment, reduced income, and outmigration from coastal areas. While Iceland’s adaptive capacity is relatively high due to its robust governance and scientific institutions, the scale of potential impacts necessitates proactive measures. Smaller-scale industries, such as aquaculture, may also face increased costs and reduced profitability, necessitating innovation in management practices.
The role of intergovernmental organizations and treaties in addressing ocean acidification is crucial for Iceland. The Paris Agreement provides a framework for reducing CO₂ emissions, which is the primary driver of acidification. Iceland’s commitment to a 40% reduction in emissions by 2030, as outlined in its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), aligns with global efforts to mitigate this issue (Government of Iceland, 2017). However, the Agreement’s focus on atmospheric warming overlooks specific marine targets, limiting its direct applicability to ocean chemistry.
The Arctic Council offers a more regionally relevant platform, with working groups like the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) producing reports on acidification trends in Arctic and sub-Arctic waters (Arctic Council, 2020). Iceland’s participation in these initiatives facilitates knowledge exchange and access to funding for monitoring programs. Similarly, the CBD and SDG frameworks emphasize marine conservation and sustainable fisheries, providing policy guidance for integrating acidification concerns into national strategies. These international mechanisms, while not binding in all aspects, underscore the importance of collaborative action given the transboundary nature of ocean chemistry changes.
Nevertheless, translating global commitments into local action remains a challenge. Iceland’s climate mitigation strategy, updated in 2017, focuses on terrestrial carbon capture and renewable energy but lacks specific measures for marine acidification (Government of Iceland, 2017). This gap highlights the need for integrated policies that address both emissions reduction and marine ecosystem protection. Furthermore, the socioeconomic dimensions of acidification impacts are underexplored in national planning, risking inadequate support for affected communities.
Recommendations
To address the complex challenges posed by ocean acidification in Iceland, a multifaceted approach is required, encompassing scientific research, policy development, and international cooperation. The following recommendations aim to guide Iceland in mitigating ecological and socioeconomic impacts while aligning with global frameworks.
- Enhanced Monitoring and Research: Establish a national ocean acidification monitoring network in Icelandic waters, leveraging partnerships with the Arctic Council and academic institutions. Focus on long-term pH measurements, species-specific responses, and food web dynamics to build a localized knowledge base. Funding should prioritize vulnerable ecosystems like cold-water coral reefs and key commercial species.
- Policy Integration with Global Treaties: Incorporate ocean acidification into Iceland’s climate adaptation and mitigation strategies under the Paris Agreement. Develop specific targets for marine pH stabilization within National Adaptation Plans, ensuring alignment with CBD and SDG commitments. Advocate for explicit recognition of ocean acidification in future UNFCCC negotiations to strengthen global policy frameworks.
- Adaptive Fisheries Management: Implement adaptive management practices in fisheries to account for acidification-induced stock variability. This includes revising quotas based on real-time ecological data, supporting diversification of harvested species, and investing in aquaculture technologies to mitigate shellfish losses. Financial assistance programs should target vulnerable coastal communities to buffer economic shocks.
- Public Awareness and Education: Increase public understanding of ocean acidification through educational campaigns, targeting both fishing communities and policymakers. Highlight the links between CO₂ emissions and marine health to foster support for mitigation measures. Collaboration with NGOs and intergovernmental bodies can amplify outreach efforts.
- International Collaboration: Strengthen engagement with the Arctic Council and other regional bodies to access technical expertise and funding for acidification research. Support transboundary initiatives to monitor North Atlantic waters, recognizing the interconnected nature of marine ecosystems. Iceland should also champion ocean acidification as a priority issue in international fora to drive collective action.
Conclusion
Ocean acidification represents a significant and growing threat to Iceland’s marine ecosystems and fisheries, with implications for biodiversity, food security, and economic stability. The rapid pH decline in North Atlantic waters, compounded by Iceland’s reliance on marine resources, underscores the urgency of addressing this issue through targeted research and policy. Impacts on calcifying organisms, plankton, and fish stocks highlight the interconnectedness of ecological and socioeconomic systems, necessitating a holistic response.
International frameworks, such as the Paris Agreement and Arctic Council initiatives, provide critical platforms for collaboration and resource-sharing, yet their translation into localized action remains incomplete. Iceland must bridge this gap by integrating ocean acidification into national strategies, enhancing monitoring capabilities, and supporting adaptive management in fisheries. Through sustained commitment to research, policy innovation, and global cooperation, Iceland can mitigate the impacts of ocean acidification and safeguard its marine heritage for future generations.
References
Arctic Council. (2020). Arctic Council COP25 side event on ocean acidification was a call for action. Arctic Council News. Retrieved from relevant web information.
Barton, A., Hales, B., Waldbusser, G. G., Langdon, C., & Feely, R. A. (2012). The Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, shows negative correlation to naturally elevated carbon dioxide levels: Implications for near-term ocean acidification effects. Limnology and Oceanography, 57(3), 698-710.
Comeau, S., Jeffree, R., Teyssié, J. L., & Gattuso, J. P. (2010). Response of the Arctic pteropod Limacina helicina to projected future environmental conditions. PLoS ONE, 5(7), e11362.
Denman, K., Christian, J. R., Steiner, N., Pörtner, H. O., & Nojiri, Y. (2011). Potential impacts of future ocean acidification on marine ecosystems and fisheries: Current knowledge and recommendations for future research. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 68(6), 1019-1029.
Doney, S. C., Fabry, V. J., Feely, R. A., & Kleypas, J. A. (2009). Ocean acidification: The other CO₂ problem. Annual Review of Marine Science, 1, 169-192.
Dupont, S., & Pörtner, H. O. (2013). A snapshot of ocean acidification research. Marine Biology, 160(8), 1765-1771.
Government of Iceland. (2017). Iceland’s climate mitigation action plan. Retrieved from relevant web information.
Guinotte, J. M., Orr, J., Cairns, S., Freiwald, A., Morgan, L., & George, R. (2006). Will human-induced changes in seawater chemistry alter the distribution of deep-sea scleractinian corals? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4(3), 141-146.
Harrould-Kolieb, E. R., & Herr, D. (2012). Ocean acidification and climate change: Synergies and challenges of addressing both under the UNFCCC. Climate Policy, 12(3), 378-389.
IPCC. (2019). Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Marine Research Institute. (2022). Annual report on fisheries catch and stock assessment. Reykjavik, Iceland.
Munday, P. L., Dixson, D. L., Donelson, J. M., Jones, G. P., Pratchett, M. S., Devitsina, G. V., & Døving, K. B. (2009). Ocean acidification impairs olfactory discrimination and homing ability of a marine fish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(6), 1848-1852.
Olafsson, J., Olafsdottir, S. R., Benoit-Cattin, A., Danielsen, M., Arnarson, T. S., & Takahashi, T. (2009). Rate of Iceland Sea acidification from time series measurements. Biogeosciences, 6(11), 2661-2668.
Statistics Iceland. (2023). Economic indicators: Fisheries contribution to GDP and exports. Reykjavik, Iceland.
