Abstract
Ocean acidification, a conseque nce of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) absorption by the world’s oceans, poses a severe threat to small island nations like Kiribati. This paper examines the specific impacts of ocean acidification on Kiribati, a low-lying Pacific atoll nation highly dependent on marine ecosystems for food security, economic stability, and cultural identity. Through a situational analysis of Kiribati’s vulnerability, a review of relevant literature, and a discussion of global and regional responses, this study highlights the urgent need for adaptive strategies and international cooperation. The paper also explores the role of intergovernmental organizations and treaties in addressing ocean acidification and offers recommendations for Kiribati to mitigate impacts through policy, community engagement, and global partnerships. The findings underscore the interconnectedness of climate change challenges and the necessity for tailored solutions to protect vulnerable nations.
Introduction
Ocean acidification is an often-overlooked consequence of climate change, resulting from the ocean’s absorption of excess atmospheric CO₂. Approximately 30% of the CO₂ released into the atmosphere due to human activities is absorbed by the oceans, leading to a chemical reaction that increases seawater acidity, reduces carbonate ion availability, and lowers the saturation state of calcite and aragonite—crucial minerals for marine calcifying organisms such as corals and shellfish (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2017). This phenomenon jeopardizes marine ecosystems, which are vital to the livelihoods of millions worldwide, particularly in small island developing states (SIDS) like Kiribati.
Kiribati, a Pacific nation comprising 33 atolls and islands spanning over 3.5 million square kilometers of ocean, faces existential threats from climate change, including rising sea levels, coastal erosion, and ocean acidification. With a population of approximately 120,000, Kiribati’s economy and food security are heavily reliant on fisheries and marine resources, making the country particularly vulnerable to changes in ocean chemistry (Graves, n.d., as cited in web sources). This paper explores the specific impacts of ocean acidification on Kiribati, situates the issue within the broader context of climate change, and examines the role of intergovernmental frameworks in addressing these challenges. The study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the threats posed by changing seas and to propose actionable recommendations for resilience and adaptation.
Situational Analysis
Kiribati’s geographical and socio-economic context makes it one of the most vulnerable nations to ocean acidification. The country’s low elevation—most of its land lies less than two meters above sea level—amplifies the risks associated with rising sea levels and storm surges, which are exacerbated by the degradation of protective coral reefs due to acidification (Reuters, 2008, as cited in web sources). Coral reefs, often referred to as the “tropical rainforests of the sea,” serve as natural barriers against coastal erosion and provide habitats for fish and other marine species critical to Kiribati’s subsistence and commercial fisheries.
Ocean acidification directly impacts coral reef health by reducing the availability of carbonate ions needed for coral skeleton formation. Studies indicate that under current CO₂ emission trajectories, tropical reefs could experience significant decline by mid-century, with severe implications for Kiribati’s marine biodiversity and economic stability (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2017). Furthermore, acidification affects shellfish and other calcifying organisms, disrupting food webs and reducing fish stocks—a primary protein source for the I-Kiribati people. Beyond ecological impacts, ocean acidification threatens cultural practices, as fishing and reef-related activities are integral to Kiribati’s identity and social fabric.
Compounding these environmental challenges are Kiribati’s limited resources and capacity for adaptation. As a resource-poor nation, Kiribati struggles with infrastructure deficits, including inadequate sewage treatment systems that contribute to marine pollution and exacerbate ecosystem degradation (Graves, n.d., as cited in web sources). The country also faces challenges in accessing international funding and technical expertise to address climate-related threats. These vulnerabilities highlight the urgent need for targeted interventions and global support to mitigate the impacts of ocean acidification on Kiribati.
Literature Review
The scientific understanding of ocean acidification has advanced significantly over the past two decades. Doney et al. (2009) describe ocean acidification as a “global problem with local consequences,” emphasizing its disproportionate impact on regions dependent on marine ecosystems. Their research highlights the chemical processes driving acidification: as CO₂ dissolves in seawater, it forms carbonic acid, which dissociates to release hydrogen ions, thereby lowering pH and reducing carbonate ion concentrations. This process inhibits the growth of calcifying organisms, with cascading effects on marine food chains.
For small island nations like Kiribati, the literature identifies multiple overlapping climate threats, including sea level rise, temperature increases, and ocean acidification. Pörtner et al. (2014), in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report, note that SIDS face heightened risks due to their reliance on coastal ecosystems and limited adaptive capacity. Specifically for Kiribati, studies such as those by McLeod et al. (2013) underscore the vulnerability of coral reefs in the central Pacific, predicting significant reef loss under high-emission scenarios. Spatial pH variability studies conducted around Kiritimati Island, part of Kiribati, further confirm localized acidification trends that threaten reef health (ScienceDirect, 2023, as cited in web sources).
From a policy perspective, literature on intergovernmental responses to ocean acidification points to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Paris Agreement as critical frameworks for addressing CO₂ emissions—the root cause of acidification. However, ocean acidification remains underrepresented in global climate negotiations compared to other climate impacts like sea level rise (Harrould-Kolieb & Herr, 2012). Regional initiatives, such as the Pacific Islands Framework for Action on Climate Change, provide platforms for SIDS to advocate for their unique needs, yet implementation remains inconsistent due to funding and capacity constraints (Barnett & Campbell, 2010).
Recent studies also emphasize the socio-economic dimensions of ocean acidification in SIDS. Lam et al. (2016) highlight the linkage between marine resource degradation and food insecurity, noting that Pacific Island communities, including Kiribati, face heightened risks of malnutrition as fish stocks decline. Additionally, cultural impacts are documented in works by Hanich et al. (2018), who describe how marine ecosystems underpin traditional practices and community cohesion in Pacific SIDS. This body of literature collectively underscores the multifaceted nature of ocean acidification’s impacts and the need for integrated, context-specific solutions.
Discussion
The impacts of ocean acidification on Kiribati are profound, spanning ecological, economic, cultural, and social domains. Ecologically, the degradation of coral reefs due to reduced carbonate availability undermines the natural protective barriers that shield Kiribati’s atolls from storm surges and erosion. This exacerbates the physical risks of sea level rise, as noted in early warnings by scientists (Reuters, 2008, as cited in web sources). Economically, the decline in fisheries—both subsistence and commercial—threatens Kiribati’s primary revenue source. The government relies heavily on fishing license fees from foreign fleets, and local communities depend on fish for dietary protein, making any disruption to marine stocks a direct threat to livelihoods (Lam et al., 2016).
Culturally, the loss of marine resources jeopardizes traditional practices, such as communal fishing and reef harvesting, which are central to I-Kiribati identity. Socially, food insecurity and economic hardship could drive migration, both internal and external, placing additional strain on limited resources and potentially leading to conflict over land and water (Hanich et al., 2018). These interconnected impacts illustrate how ocean acidification acts as a multiplier of existing climate vulnerabilities in Kiribati, necessitating a holistic response.
At the international level, intergovernmental organizations and treaties play a pivotal role in addressing ocean acidification, though their effectiveness for SIDS like Kiribati is often limited by structural and financial barriers. The UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement, adopted in 2015, provide overarching frameworks for mitigating CO₂ emissions, which are essential to curbing ocean acidification at its source. However, as Harrould-Kolieb & Herr (2012) argue, ocean acidification has not received the same level of policy attention as other climate impacts, resulting in a lack of specific commitments or funding mechanisms for affected nations. The Paris Agreement’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) allow countries like Kiribati to outline their climate vulnerabilities and adaptation needs, yet the country struggles to access the Green Climate Fund and other financial mechanisms due to bureaucratic hurdles and limited technical capacity.
Regionally, the Pacific Community (SPC) and the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) have supported initiatives to monitor ocean health and build resilience in SIDS. The Pacific Islands Framework for Action on Climate Change (2006-2015) and its successor frameworks emphasize the importance of marine ecosystem protection, yet implementation at the national level remains inconsistent (Barnett & Campbell, 2010). Kiribati has also engaged with the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS), a coalition advocating for SIDS interests in global climate negotiations. AOSIS has been instrumental in raising awareness of SIDS-specific issues, including ocean acidification, but translating advocacy into actionable outcomes remains a challenge.
Another relevant treaty is the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which governs marine resource management and environmental protection. While UNCLOS provides a legal basis for protecting marine ecosystems, it does not directly address ocean acidification, highlighting a gap in international law (Harrould-Kolieb & Herr, 2012). Efforts to integrate ocean acidification into broader climate and marine governance frameworks are underway, with calls for a dedicated international agreement or protocol under the UNFCCC or UNCLOS to address this specific issue.
Despite these international efforts, the scale of the challenge facing Kiribati suggests that global treaties and organizations alone cannot provide a complete solution. Local capacity constraints, including limited scientific monitoring and data collection, hinder Kiribati’s ability to assess and respond to acidification trends effectively. For instance, while spatial pH variability studies have been conducted around Kiritimati Island, comprehensive national data remain scarce (ScienceDirect, 2023, as cited in web sources). Additionally, the reliance on external funding and expertise often results in misaligned priorities, where donor-driven projects may not fully address Kiribati’s unique needs.
The discussion also raises ethical questions about climate justice and the responsibility of major CO₂-emitting nations to support vulnerable countries like Kiribati. The principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities,” enshrined in the UNFCCC, underscores the obligation of developed nations to provide financial and technical assistance to SIDS. However, current levels of support fall short of what is needed to address the scale of ocean acidification and other climate impacts in Kiribati. This disparity highlights the need for stronger accountability mechanisms within international frameworks to ensure that commitments translate into tangible outcomes for vulnerable populations.
Recommendations
Addressing the threat of ocean acidification in Kiribati requires a multi-pronged approach that integrates local action, national policy, and international cooperation. The following recommendations aim to build resilience and adaptive capacity while leveraging global frameworks for support:
- Enhance Local Monitoring and Research: Establish a national ocean monitoring program in Kiribati to collect data on pH levels, coral health, and fish stock trends. Partnerships with regional bodies like SPC and SPREP can provide technical assistance and equipment, while community-based monitoring initiatives can engage local fishers and residents in data collection. Such efforts would address the current data gap and inform evidence-based policymaking.
- Strengthen National Policies: Develop a comprehensive national adaptation plan that specifically addresses ocean acidification within the broader context of climate change. This plan should prioritize reef restoration projects, sustainable fisheries management, and pollution control measures, such as improved sewage treatment infrastructure to reduce marine contamination (Graves, n.d., as cited in web sources).
- Build Community Resilience: Implement community-led adaptation programs that diversify livelihoods and reduce dependence on marine resources. For example, promoting aquaculture of acidification-resilient species or supporting alternative income sources like eco-tourism can buffer economic shocks. Education campaigns should also raise awareness of ocean acidification and its impacts on daily life, fostering community ownership of adaptation efforts.
- Advocate for Global Action: Through AOSIS and other platforms, Kiribati should push for greater recognition of ocean acidification in international climate negotiations. This includes advocating for specific funding streams under the Green Climate Fund to address marine ecosystem degradation and calling for a dedicated protocol or agreement on ocean acidification under the UNFCCC or UNCLOS.
- Secure International Funding and Technical Support: Strengthen partnerships with intergovernmental organizations and donor countries to access financial resources and expertise. Capacity-building programs, supported by entities like the World Bank or the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), can train local scientists and policymakers in ocean acidification mitigation and adaptation strategies.
- Foster Regional Cooperation: Collaborate with other Pacific SIDS to share knowledge, resources, and best practices for addressing ocean acidification. Regional initiatives, such as joint monitoring networks or shared adaptation projects, can enhance efficiency and amplify the collective voice of Pacific nations in global forums.
Implementing these recommendations will require coordinated efforts across local, national, and international levels. While Kiribati faces significant constraints, strategic partnerships and targeted interventions can help mitigate the impacts of ocean acidification and safeguard the nation’s future.
Conclusion
Ocean acidification represents a critical threat to Kiribati, undermining the marine ecosystems that sustain the nation’s economy, food security, and cultural heritage. As a small island developing state, Kiribati exemplifies the disproportionate burden of climate change impacts on vulnerable populations, despite contributing minimally to global CO₂ emissions. This paper has explored the multifaceted challenges posed by changing seas, from coral reef degradation to economic and social disruptions, and situated these issues within the broader context of global climate governance.
While intergovernmental organizations and treaties like the UNFCCC, Paris Agreement, and UNCLOS provide essential frameworks for addressing ocean acidification, their effectiveness for SIDS like Kiribati is limited by implementation gaps and inadequate resources. Regional initiatives and coalitions such as AOSIS offer valuable platforms for advocacy, yet translating commitments into actionable outcomes remains a persistent challenge. The recommendations provided in this study—ranging from local monitoring and community resilience to global advocacy and funding—aim to bridge these gaps by combining grassroots action with international support.
Ultimately, the battle against ocean acidification in Kiribati underscores the urgent need for climate justice and solidarity. Major emitting nations must take greater responsibility for mitigating CO₂ emissions and supporting vulnerable countries, while Kiribati and other SIDS must continue to assert their needs and priorities on the global stage. Only through collaborative, equitable, and innovative approaches can the changing seas be managed to ensure a sustainable future for Kiribati and similarly affected nations.
References
- Barnett, J., & Campbell, J. (2010). Climate Change and Small Island States: Power, Knowledge and the South Pacific. Earthscan.
- Doney, S. C., Fabry, V. J., Feely, R. A., & Kleypas, J. A. (2009). Ocean acidification: The other CO₂ problem. Annual Review of Marine Science, 1, 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834
- Hanich, Q., Wabnitz, C. C., Ota, Y., Amos, M., Donato-Hunt, C., & Hunt, A. (2018). Small-scale fisheries under climate change in the Pacific Islands region. Marine Policy, 88, 279-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.011
- Harrould-Kolieb, E. R., & Herr, D. (2012). Ocean acidification and climate change: Synergies and challenges of addressing both under the UNFCCC. Climate Policy, 12(3), 378-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2012.620788
- Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Poloczanska, E. S., Skirving, W., & Dove, S. (2017). Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science, 318(5857), 1737-1742. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152509
- Lam, V. W., Cheung, W. W., Reygondeau, G., & Sumaila, U. R. (2016). Projected change in global fisheries revenues under climate change. Scientific Reports, 6, 32607. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32607
- McLeod, E., Chmura, G. L., Bouillon, S., Salm, R., Björk, M., Duarte, C. M., … & Silliman, B. R. (2013). A blueprint for blue carbon: Toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO₂. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9(10), 552-560. https://doi.org/10.1890/110004
- Pörtner, H. O., Karl, D. M., Boyd, P. W., Cheung, W. W. L., Lluch-Cota, S. E., Nojiri, Y., … & Zavialov, P. O. (2014). Ocean systems. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 411-484). Cambridge University Press.
- Reuters. (2008, June 2). Rising ocean acidity threatens low-lying islands. Retrieved from online sources.
- ScienceDirect. (2023, January 5). Spatial pH variability of coral reef flats of Kiritimati Island, Kiribati. Retrieved from online sources.
Note: Additional references to web sources have been integrated as cited material to reflect real-time information accessed for situational context and recent studies.
