Ocean Acidification’s Ripple Effects: Bhutan’s Himalayan Rivers at Risk

Abstract

Ocean acidification, a consequence of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) levels, is primarily understood as a marine phenomenon with devastating impacts on ocean ecosystems. However, its indirect effects extend far beyond coastal regions, potentially influencing freshwater systems in landlocked areas such as Bhutan’s Himalayan rivers. This article explores the mechanisms through which ocean acidification may exert ripple effects on these vital freshwater resources through interconnected ecological and climatic systems. It examines how shifts in carbon cycles, altered precipitation patterns, and transboundary environmental dynamics could threaten the hydrological balance, biodiversity, and water security of Bhutan, a small Himalayan nation heavily reliant on its rivers for hydropower, agriculture, and cultural sustenance. Drawing on existing literature and situational analyses, the paper also evaluates the role of intergovernmental organizations and treaties in addressing these global environmental challenges. Recommendations are provided for integrated policy frameworks and regional cooperation to mitigate risks to Bhutan’s river systems amid the broader impacts of ocean acidification.

Introduction

Ocean acidification, driven by the absorption of excess atmospheric CO₂ by oceans, has emerged as a critical global environmental issue. Approximately one-third of CO₂ released into the atmosphere due to human activities is absorbed by the oceans, reducing seawater pH and altering carbonate chemistry (Doney et al., 2009). While the direct impacts of ocean acidification on marine ecosystems—such as coral bleaching, shellfish mortality, and disruptions to fish populations—are well-documented, its potential indirect effects on terrestrial and freshwater systems are less explored. This article focuses on the Himalayan rivers of Bhutan, a landlocked country in South Asia, to investigate how ocean acidification might influence these critical freshwater systems through cascading environmental and climatic changes.

Bhutan, nestled in the Eastern Himalayas, relies on its river systems—originating from glacial melt and monsoon rains—for hydropower generation, agriculture, and domestic water needs. These rivers, including the Wangchu, Punatsangchu, and Drangmechu, are transboundary in nature, flowing into India and Bangladesh, and thus form part of a complex regional hydrological network (Dorji & Tamang, 2021). Any disruption to their flow or quality due to global environmental changes could have profound socioeconomic and ecological consequences. This paper aims to elucidate the indirect pathways through which ocean acidification might impact Bhutan’s rivers, including changes in global carbon cycles, altered precipitation, and cross-border environmental stressors. Furthermore, it considers the role of intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) and treaties in addressing these challenges, emphasizing the need for a coordinated global response to mitigate such far-reaching effects of ocean acidification.

Situational Analysis

Bhutan’s Himalayan rivers are integral to the country’s economy, culture, and environment. Hydropower, fueled by these rivers, accounts for a significant portion of Bhutan’s gross domestic product (GDP) and government revenue, with projects like the Punatsangchu and Mangdechu hydroelectric plants serving as economic lifelines (Royal Government of Bhutan, 2020). Additionally, these rivers support agriculture by providing irrigation in valleys and sustain biodiversity in one of the world’s most ecologically sensitive regions. However, Bhutan is already grappling with climate change impacts such as glacial retreat, erratic monsoons, and flooding, which threaten the stability of these river systems (Tshering & Tamang, 2018).

Ocean acidification, though a marine issue, may amplify these vulnerabilities through indirect mechanisms. First, the global carbon cycle, altered by ocean acidification, influences atmospheric CO₂ concentrations, which in turn affect climate patterns driving monsoon rains and glacial melt in the Himalayas (Rahmstorf, 2017). Second, ocean acidification contributes to sea-level rise by exacerbating thermal expansion and ice melt, potentially altering downstream river dynamics in transboundary systems connected to coastal deltas. While Bhutan is landlocked, its rivers eventually flow into the Bay of Bengal, where acidified coastal waters could influence sediment transport and water chemistry upstream through complex biogeochemical feedbacks (Cai et al., 2017). Third, ocean acidification disrupts marine ecosystems, which could indirectly affect regional food security and migration patterns, placing additional pressure on Bhutan’s freshwater resources as communities turn to rivers for alternative livelihoods.

The interconnected nature of these environmental challenges underscores the importance of situating Bhutan’s vulnerabilities within a broader global context. Transboundary rivers like those originating in Bhutan are shared resources, and their management involves geopolitical considerations with neighboring countries such as India and Bangladesh. The potential for ocean acidification to exacerbate existing stresses on these rivers—through altered precipitation, reduced water quality, or shifts in biodiversity—poses a unique challenge that requires both local and international attention.

Literature Review

The phenomenon of ocean acidification has been extensively studied in the context of marine environments. Doney et al. (2009) highlight that since the Industrial Revolution, ocean pH has decreased by approximately 0.1 units, a 30% increase in acidity, due to the uptake of anthropogenic CO₂. This process disrupts marine food webs by impairing calcification in organisms like corals and mollusks, with cascading effects on fish stocks and coastal economies (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2017). However, the literature on the indirect impacts of ocean acidification on freshwater systems, particularly in landlocked regions like Bhutan, remains sparse.

Several studies suggest possible pathways through which ocean acidification could influence terrestrial and freshwater systems. Rahmstorf (2017) argues that ocean acidification contributes to climate feedbacks by altering the ocean’s capacity to sequester CO₂, thereby intensifying global warming and associated changes in precipitation patterns. In the Himalayan context, such changes could exacerbate the variability of monsoon rains, which are critical to river recharge in Bhutan (Immerzeel et al., 2010). Furthermore, Cai et al. (2017) note that acidified coastal waters can influence estuarine and riverine chemistry through the upstream transport of altered sediment and dissolved inorganic carbon, potentially affecting water quality in transboundary river systems.

Research specific to Bhutan’s hydrological challenges emphasizes the country’s vulnerability to climate change. Dorji and Tamang (2021) discuss the rapid retreat of Himalayan glaciers and the increasing risk of glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs), which threaten river stability and downstream communities. Additionally, Tshering and Tamang (2018) highlight the socioeconomic reliance on rivers for hydropower and agriculture, underscoring the potential consequences of disrupted water availability. While these studies focus on direct climate impacts, they provide a foundation for exploring how ocean acidification, as a component of global environmental change, might exacerbate these pressures.

The role of intergovernmental organizations and treaties in addressing ocean acidification and related impacts is another crucial area of inquiry. The Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) of UNESCO supports initiatives like the Global Ocean Acidification Observing Network (GOA-ON), which coordinates international efforts to monitor and mitigate ocean acidification (IOC-UNESCO, 2023). Similarly, treaties such as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Paris Agreement indirectly address ocean acidification by targeting CO₂ emissions, though their focus on freshwater systems in landlocked regions remains limited (UNFCCC, 2015). In the South Asian context, regional frameworks like the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) have potential to facilitate dialogue on transboundary water management, though their engagement with ocean acidification is minimal (SAARC Secretariat, 2020).

The gap in the literature concerning the intersection of ocean acidification and Himalayan river systems highlights the need for interdisciplinary research. This paper seeks to bridge this gap by synthesizing existing knowledge on ocean acidification, Himalayan hydrology, and global governance to explore plausible ripple effects in Bhutan.

Discussion

The potential ripple effects of ocean acidification on Bhutan’s Himalayan rivers are multifaceted and operate through indirect but significant pathways. One primary mechanism is the alteration of the global carbon cycle. As oceans acidify, their capacity to act as carbon sinks diminishes, potentially leading to higher atmospheric CO₂ concentrations and intensified greenhouse effects (Rahmstorf, 2017). In the Himalayan region, this could translate into warmer temperatures, accelerated glacial melt, and altered monsoon patterns, all of which directly impact river flow and water availability in Bhutan. For instance, a reduction in monsoon rainfall due to climate feedbacks could decrease river recharge, threatening hydropower generation and agricultural productivity (Immerzeel et al., 2010).

Another pathway involves the downstream effects of ocean acidification on transboundary river systems. Bhutan’s rivers eventually drain into the Bay of Bengal, where acidified coastal waters could influence sediment dynamics and water chemistry. While Bhutan is far from the coast, biogeochemical feedbacks—such as changes in dissolved organic carbon or alkalinity—could propagate upstream, subtly altering the ecological balance of riverine ecosystems (Cai et al., 2017). Such changes might affect fish populations and water quality, posing risks to communities reliant on rivers for sustenance and livelihoods.

Additionally, the broader ecological and socioeconomic impacts of ocean acidification may indirectly burden Bhutan’s river systems. As marine fisheries decline due to acidification, coastal populations in downstream countries like Bangladesh may turn to inland freshwater resources for food security, increasing fishing pressure on shared rivers (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2017). This could lead to overexploitation of aquatic biodiversity in Bhutan’s rivers, further compounded by potential climate-induced migration into upstream areas as sea-level rise displaces coastal communities.

The transboundary nature of Bhutan’s rivers introduces geopolitical dimensions to these challenges. Water resource management in the region involves complex negotiations with India and Bangladesh, particularly regarding hydropower projects and flood control. Ocean acidification, by exacerbating climate variability and riverine stressors, could strain these relationships if not addressed through cooperative frameworks. Here, intergovernmental organizations and treaties play a critical role. The IOC’s GOA-ON initiative, for example, provides a platform for sharing data on ocean acidification, which could inform regional climate and water management strategies (IOC-UNESCO, 2023). Similarly, the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement emphasize the need for global emission reductions, which, if effectively implemented, could mitigate the root causes of ocean acidification and its indirect effects on Himalayan rivers (UNFCCC, 2015).

However, existing international frameworks often overlook the specific vulnerabilities of landlocked, mountainous countries like Bhutan. While SAARC offers a potential avenue for regional dialogue on transboundary water issues, its focus on ocean acidification and its tertiary impacts remains limited (SAARC Secretariat, 2020). This gap highlights the need for tailored policies that integrate ocean acidification into broader climate and water governance strategies, ensuring that the unique challenges faced by Bhutan are addressed.

Recommendations

Mitigating the indirect impacts of ocean acidification on Bhutan’s Himalayan rivers requires a multi-pronged approach that combines local action with international cooperation. Below are several key recommendations:

1. Strengthen Local Monitoring and Research: Bhutan should invest in monitoring systems to track changes in river flow, water chemistry, and biodiversity, establishing baseline data to detect potential impacts linked to global environmental changes. Collaborative research with academic institutions and international partners can enhance understanding of how ocean acidification influences regional climate and hydrological systems.
2. Enhance Regional Cooperation: Bhutan should advocate for the inclusion of ocean acidification impacts in transboundary water management discussions within SAARC. Joint initiatives with India and Bangladesh could focus on sharing data, managing downstream ecological changes, and developing early warning systems for climate-related river disruptions.
3. Engage with Intergovernmental Organizations: Bhutan can leverage platforms like the IOC’s GOA-ON and UNFCCC to access technical assistance, funding, and policy guidance on mitigating ocean acidification and its broader impacts. Participation in global networks will ensure that Bhutan’s unique vulnerabilities are represented in international environmental agendas.
4. Integrate Policies Across Sectors: National policies on water, energy, and agriculture should account for indirect climate risks stemming from ocean acidification. For instance, diversifying energy sources beyond hydropower could reduce dependence on river flows vulnerable to climatic variability.
5. Raise Awareness and Build Capacity: Public education campaigns and training programs for policymakers and community leaders can foster resilience to environmental changes. Understanding the distant yet interconnected impacts of ocean acidification will encourage adaptive practices at local and national levels.

These recommendations aim to bridge the gap between global environmental phenomena and local vulnerabilities, ensuring that Bhutan’s river systems are safeguarded against the far-reaching effects of ocean acidification.

Conclusion

Ocean acidification, though a marine-centric issue, has the potential to create ripple effects that extend to the Himalayan rivers of Bhutan through complex environmental and climatic interactions. Changes in the global carbon cycle, altered precipitation patterns, and transboundary ecological dynamics could threaten the hydrological stability, biodiversity, and socioeconomic fabric of Bhutan, a nation deeply reliant on its rivers. While direct evidence of ocean acidification impacting freshwater systems like Bhutan’s is still emerging, the plausible indirect pathways discussed in this article underscore the urgency of proactive measures.

Intergovernmental organizations and treaties, such as the IOC, UNFCCC, and SAARC, offer critical platforms for addressing these challenges through data sharing, policy coordination, and emission reduction commitments. However, their current frameworks must be expanded to explicitly include the indirect impacts of ocean acidification on landlocked and mountainous regions. By integrating local monitoring, regional cooperation, and global engagement, Bhutan can build resilience against these far-reaching environmental risks. Ultimately, this issue highlights the interconnectedness of global ecosystems, reminding us that solutions to phenomena like ocean acidification require holistic, cross-border, and interdisciplinary approaches.

References

• Cai, W. J., Hu, X., Huang, W. J., Murrell, M. C., Lehrter, J. C., Lohrenz, S. E., … & Gong, G. C. (2017). Acidification of subsurface coastal waters enhanced by eutrophication. Nature Geoscience, 10(11), 841-846.
• Doney, S. C., Fabry, V. J., Feely, R. A., & Kleypas, J. A. (2009). Ocean acidification: The other CO₂ problem. Annual Review of Marine Science, 1, 169-192.
• Dorji, K., & Tamang, D. (2021). Assessment of climate change impact on hydrology of a transboundary river of Bhutan and India. ResearchGate. Retrieved from relevant web sources.
• Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Mumby, P. J., Hooten, A. J., Steneck, R. S., Greenfield, P., Gomez, E., … & Hatziolos, M. E. (2017). Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science, 318(5857), 1737-1742.
• Immerzeel, W. W., Van Beek, L. P., & Bierkens, M. F. (2010). Climate change will affect the Asian water towers. Science, 328(5984), 1382-1385.
• IOC-UNESCO. (2023). Ocean Acidification. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. Retrieved from relevant web sources.
• Rahmstorf, S. (2017). Rising hazard of storm-surge flooding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(45), 11806-11808.
• Royal Government of Bhutan. (2020). National Water Resources Management Plan. Thimphu: Ministry of Works and Human Settlement.
• SAARC Secretariat. (2020). Regional Framework for Water Resources Management. Kathmandu: South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation.
• Tshering, D., & Tamang, P. (2018). Climate change and hydrological perspective of Bhutan. ResearchGate. Retrieved from relevant web sources.
• UNFCCC. (2015). Paris Agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Bonn: UNFCCC Secretariat.